Quantcast

“What Happened Today Is Not Okay”: Daughter Speaks at Norwalk Protest After ICE Arrest

State Rep. Kadeem Roberts, left, Common Council member Jalin Sead Sr., center, and Leonela Chávez, right with megaphone, march with protesters in Norwalk, Conn., on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. (Photo by Ashley RK Smith)

NORWALK, Conn. — Two straight days of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity in Norwalk ended in protest Friday night, after agents detained three men, including two seen in an arrest caught on video.

“Today we saw videos, we saw pictures… those are real people, they aren’t just stories….
We need to say their names.”

City of Norwalk Common Council Member Jalin Sead Sr.

ICE’s media office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. An automatic reply said the spokesperson was out of the office.

Leonela Chávez speaks through a megaphone during a protest in Norwalk, Conn., on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. (Photo by Ashley RK Smith)

The arrest followed two tense days in the city. On Thursday, ICE agents appeared at Norwalk Police headquarters, where Police Chief James Walsh confronted them and told them to leave.

The next morning, ICE returned, and video shows agents detaining two of the men outside the AMC theater in South Norwalk.

At least one of the men was tased during the arrest. Family members and protesters said a third man was also taken into custody and identified the three as Juan, Leo and Richardo Chávez.

However, it was not immediately clear which of them appear in the video.

The incidents drew sharp condemnation from city officials and set the stage for a large evening protest.

It began on the East Avenue overpass above I-95, where demonstrators waved signs at rush hour traffic.

There, Leonela Chávez, a daughter of one of the men, told NancyonNorwalk that her father called the family after being detained.

“She just called me and she just let me know that my dad called her and let her know that he had been detained,” Chávez said. “My dad is someone who is very aware of his rights.”

“He asked them, ‘Where is the arrest warrant? Why are you arresting me?’ … They’re not responding to him. They’re not giving him any answers…”

Leonela Chávez
A woman speaks through a megaphone in Spanish during a protest against ICE in Norwalk, Conn., on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. (Photo by Ashley RK Smith)

Chávez said her father was tased at close range, leaving him injured, and that no warrant was presented during the arrest.

“Never break my dad’s spirit, because I was able to speak with him, and he just told me, he’s like, ‘You know what you need to do — take care of your siblings and your mom. Everything’s gonna be okay. We’re gonna figure it out,’” she said.

From there, the crowd regrouped at Norwalk Police headquarters, joined by city and state leaders.

Chávez told the crowd what the arrest had done to her family.

“My dad and my uncles are hardworking individuals in this country,” Chávez said. “They raised me, a UConn graduate. I’m getting my master’s in clinical psychology at Sacred Heart University. I want to be better for my dad, for my family, and yet he was still ripped away from me … What happened today is not okay.”

She said the family had been sharing ICE sighting videos in a group chat the night before. Her father’s last message was short: “Don’t worry.” “And the next day, today, he was ripped out of our lives,” Chávez said. “Please think about them and say their name.”

Common Councilmember Johan Lopez said, “[The federal administration has] failed to live up to American values, which is to be a defender of our constitutional principles, of our civil liberties, and of our neighbors, regardless of where they come from, what they look like, or immigration status… every human being deserves to be treated with dignity and humanity.”

“Let’s push back,” Senator Bob Duff urged. “Because you know what a bully doesn’t like — a poke in the eye. Let’s poke him in the eye. Let’s push them back. Let’s make sure when ICE comes back to Norwalk, we say, ‘Get out. Get out. Get out of our town.’ We are Norwalkers. We stand together.”

State Rep. Kadeem Roberts said the arrest struck close to home: “My parents are Jamaican and Antiguan, straight immigrants off the boat,” Roberts said.

“I had to tell my mom today, ‘Make sure you walk with your paperwork.’”

Connecticut State Representative Kadeem Roberts

Though she’s a citizen, her accent is very strong, and Lord knows what can happen,” he continued. “Though her son is a state representative, respectfully, in America, as a Black man, that doesn’t mean anything.”

Mayor Harry Rilling told the crowd that Norwalk would continue to stand by immigrant families: “Our goal is to ensure all residents are treated with dignity and respect, regardless of anyone’s immigration status or background.”

“The saying is ‘United, we stand,’ but the next sentence is ‘Divided, we fall.’ So let’s not divide ourselves. Let’s not stop until we have every single Norwalk resident here protesting.”

City of Norwalk Mayor Harry Rilling
Demonstrators hold signs, including one reading “Deport Cruelty,” during a protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Norwalk, Conn., on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. (Photo by Ashley RK Smith)


Other community leaders echoed the same theme. “We are a diverse and welcoming community,” Common Councilman Josh Goldstein said. “Our values of dignity, respect, and equality are stronger than anything ICE can bring.”

Several lawmakers pledged to strengthen Connecticut’s Trust Act, which limits local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

“My colleagues that are here with me today, they have my back, and I know they know I have their back,” State Rep. Travis Simms said. “So we’re going to make sure we go up to Hartford and we put forth legislation that will stop ICE in their tracks.”

“We got to make it difficult for them so they can’t continue to run rampage and just destroy our homes, destroy our families.”

Connecticut State Representative Travis Simms

State Rep. Lucy Dathan said she worried about how ICE activity would affect children when schools reopen.

“I am very worried about what’s going to happen in two, three weeks’ time, when schools start up. Are children going to feel safe going to school? Are they going to feel safe waiting for the buses? We need to ensure as a community that we stand by them and protect everyone in our community.”

Rilling said he has been in contact with federal and state authorities since the incidents.

“We have been in touch with federal and state authorities to work through this issue. One of the things that I’ve been guaranteed is that the federal authorities are going to ask the agents not to wear masks while they’re in the city of Norwalk. The other thing that we want them to do as a courtesy — because any other law enforcement organization does it — is to call and let us know you’re coming.”

The protest then turned into a march through downtown, with chants echoing off the buildings.

“Los latinos unidos no serán vencidos! Latinx united will not be defeated!”

Protestors
Protesters carry signs comparing ICE agents to “Gestapo Barbie” and “Gestapo Ken,” alongside messages such as “Fight Ignorance, Not Immigrants,” during a rally in Norwalk, Conn., on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. (Photo by Ashley RK Smith)

Finally, the marchers reached the corner of Main and Ann Street, the spot where ICE agents had tased and detained Chávez’s father earlier that morning.

Glass from his car windows, broken during the arrest, was still scattered on the ground.

Among those attending were Mayor Harry Rilling and his wife, Lucia; state Sen. Bob Duff, state Reps. Travis Simms, Kadeem Roberts, and Lucy Dathan; Common Council members Barbara Smyth, Darlene Young, Josh Goldstein, Nora Niedzielski-Eichner, Anne Wennerstrand, Johan Lopez, and Jalin Sead Sr.; and Board of Education members Diana Carpio, Sheri McCready-Pritchett, Kara Nelson Baekey, Ashley Gulyas, and Jasmine Prezzie.

The crowd may have included other local officials and community leaders not seen by NancyonNorwalk.

Editor’s note: A previous version misattributed a quote to Sen. Bob Duff. The quote was said by Mayor Harry Rilling. The story has been updated.

Comments

33 responses to ““What Happened Today Is Not Okay”: Daughter Speaks at Norwalk Protest After ICE Arrest”

  1. Mike Murray

    All those interviews, yet the main question not asked was if they are legally in this country or are they illegal aliens?

    1. Ashley Smith

      Thanks for your comment. In the United States, the Constitution protects everyone’s basic rights, regardless of citizenship or legal status. Courts have consistently affirmed that due process and equal protection apply to all people on U.S. soil.

      I also didn’t ask what religion they are, or who they love: because those things, like immigration status, don’t determine whether someone deserves to be treated with dignity and fairness.

      1. Mike Murray

        Although I agree with you that race, religion, or even Nationally are not relevant, I would think that their legal status in this country and their conviction status is relevant. Tasers are often used on criminals who are resisting or fleeing. If this person is legally in this country or a US citizen not wanted for a crime, it would be an egregious use of force on an innocent person. If they are wanted criminals or under a deportation order attempting to resist being taken into custody or fleeing to escape, that is a different matter. If you were able to confirm that this was an innocent US citizen, imagine how that would have played out with the public, compared to if he is a convicted criminal illegal alien. There is a difference.

        1. Ashley Smith

          Once again — in this country, you are innocent until proven guilty. That principle doesn’t change based on whether someone is a citizen, has papers, or has prior convictions.

          I understand this is a difficult conversation, especially for anyone connected to a police agency. But it’s an extremely important one. Diluting it by jumping straight to immigration status misses the core issue and isn’t good for anyone.

          The Constitution requires the government to treat every person according to due process. That means no one can be deprived of liberty without proper legal steps, and no one is stripped of their rights simply because an agency claims they are guilty or undesirable.

          You’re framing it as if we should judge whether force was justified based on who the person might be. But that misses the point. At the moment force is used, the government is still required to follow the law — not assumptions, not profiling, not speculation about someone’s background.

          That’s why I keep bringing it back to process, not status. Due process isn’t about who the person is. It’s about what the government did, and whether they respected constitutional limits when they did it.

          If we allow the conversation to shift into “who” the person is instead of “what” the government did, we risk normalizing violations of constitutional rights.

          You might be someone who is okay with normalizing violations of constitutional rights, and that’s your choice.

          But it’s my job to point it out when government power is exercised this way so people can see it, think about it, and decide for themselves whether they’re okay with it.

        2. adam smith

          Courts have repeatedly said that not being White in public is not sufficient probable cause for ICE or any law enforcement agency to stop people and demand papers. Nor is hanging out at Home Depot, eating at a Latin restaurant, or speaking Spanish. They are supposed to have reasonable suspicion of a crime, not just he’s brown, probably illegal.

          1. Skip Hagerty

            An article in the CT Mirror stated:
            According to ICE, 29 of the 65 people arrested had been either charged with or convicted of “serious crimes.” Of the 13 people named in the release, five were arrested in Stamford, two in Norwalk, and six in Danbury. Some of the 13 people identified in the release had been convicted of crimes, including drug possession, sexual assault, DUI and larceny, according to ICE. Others were facing charges, including assault, breach of peace, and carrying a dangerous weapon.
            Then, a CT Public radio article stated:
            ‘Two of those identified were from Norwalk. One was convicted for sexual assault, threatening and drunk driving. Another resident faced criminal charges for selling cannabis’.
            Since no names are provided, it’s unfair to say that these are the same individuals involved in the terrible incident outside the movie theater, but it would be good if NoN did some research on important stories like this.

          2. Skip Hagerty

            I just found this release that seems to indicate that the two individuals from Norwalk identified by ICE were not the same as those they apprehended outside the movie theater:
            https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/connecticut-sanctuary-no-more-ice-federal-partners-remove-dangerous-illegal-aliens
            Maybe NoN could dig a little digging like this for its readers?
            Not sure what the offenses were of the other ICE detainees, but some of the ones listed by ICE in this article have “resumes” that read like those of a demon.

          3. David Muccigrosso

            @skip,

            If Martha Stewart, myself, and 27 of our closest friends who’d kept their noses clean until now, all got caught up in an insider trading dragnet and charged, the SEC could make the technically “correct” statement that “29 people have been charged or convicted of insider trading in this ring”, but only ONE of us would actually have ever been convicted of insider trading — Martha.

            ICE is desperate for bodies to make Stephen Miller’s insane quotas. They can charge people all day long with “VERY SERIOUS CRIMES” and make VERY SERIOUS FACES about how VERY SERIOUS those CRIMES were, but only a fool would think they actually care if those charges stick.

      2. Emily Kelting

        Thank you for reporting this story, Ashley. As you say, all of our Norwalk neighbors deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, and enjoy their legal rights protected under the Constitution including viewing an arrest warrant, which Mr. Chavez requested of the ICE agents and wasn’t provided. They didn’t notify him of any criminal record. I understand that Mr. Chavez has been working as the Assistant Sexton in a local church. He is much loved by the people there, as well as his Norwalk neighbors. His daughter, who just graduated from UConn and now is getting an advanced degree, claims it was his father’s values that made such a difference in her success. This doesn’t sound like a hardened criminal to me. It sounds like the ICE agents were acting illegally when they smashed his windshield and didn’t provide an arrest warrant. And if they didn’t have evidence of any criminal record, they should be also be prosecuted for tasing an innocent man. Trump himself has created and condoned violence in this country, rather than adhering to the rule of law. It sickens me that federal agents can come into my city and arrest black and brown people without any warrants. We have an active and efficient police force here to deal with real criminals. And in this case, it is the ICE agents, not the Chavez family, who are the criminals.

        1. John O’Neill

          Maybe with a little luck towns like New Canaan or Westport will one day welcome All low income students in their school system with open arms.
          I can only dream…Maybe Private Schools can offer vouchers for every immigrant child who has crossed our border in the
          the last 25 years or so…Until that happens I don’t see your point…

          1. adam smith

            So you’re excusing the actions of these agents because somewhere a kid got a free education? What does a kid getting a free education have to do with ICE targeting adult Latinos for being out in public?

        2. adam smith

          Trump promised to go after the worst of the worst. None of us have a problem with really bad people, violent criminals being locked up (with Due Process) and sent back to wherever they came from. The problem is so far it has been something like 70% people with no record, here just trying to make a better life for themselves and their families, and they seem to be ignoring the really bad people here. The whole point seems to be to be cruel. If it were about laws it would be applied equally. First of all they would all have Due Process if we’re talking about obeying laws. But beyond that, they would be going after violent people, too, they’d be checking Whites as well since we have over a million undocumented Whites, and they’d be targeting Red states equally. Their primary concern seems to be to go after people on farms in California, and anyone else working blue-collar jobs in Blue states with no records, or no serious records. Then our government lies and says everyone they arrested is the head of MS-13 or some such like that, or that they assaulted ICE agents for no falling down quickly-enough when agents assaulted them. In one story a woman was literally getting out of her car when she got dropped off for work and was tackled by ICE who said she assaulted them, literally for standing there for 2 seconds before being tackled. They keep picking up American citizens, doctors, lawyers, soldiers, even other law enforcement agents all here legally, none doing anything wrong, but fitting the description according to ICE. Republicans will lose their minds if Rubio ever gets picked up. They only seem to favor Latino democrats being arrested like what happened with Alex Padilla who republicans there claimed no one knew who he was (because all Latinos look the same, right? Rubio and Ricky Martin are interchangeable?),

          We still have no explanation for why this even happened. Did they see them breaking some law or just looked for Latinos to stop in public. The public needs to know if it’s no longer safe to be Latino in Norwalk so they can make plans to move.

    2. adam smith

      What difference does it make? ICE should not be stopping people for not looking white-enough to be in the country. 70,000,000 Latinos are here LEGALLY. That’s far to big a number to justify stopping everyone brown and demanding papers like the SS did to Jews. How would you feel if ICE started stopping White people to demand papers and detaining White people and telling them their papers are fake? And how would you feel not being afforded Due Process?

  2. Liz Conti

    Agree Mike, it is easy to die on a hill of political rhetoric and to pick a side without having information. That is the problem with sanctuary cities that are barred from sharing information with federal authorities which leads to potential mistakes that fuel a political agenda rather than serve the rights of all citizens and residents to be safe in the communities they live.

    It’s always politics over common sense. Where is the rest of the story? The mayor Riling trots out and puts fuel on the fire about how ICE was asked to leave a “public parking lot” like that is the problem, while they do not address that which is censored like who are the men apprehended and why? If they were mistakenly identified by ICE it is not ICE fault but rather the lack of cooperation in determining where the real criminals are and can be removed as necessary to support a safe community for all.

    1. adam smith

      ICE has to ASK Norwalk PD to use their property. They can’t just show up and use it. Federal agents have no more right to do that than Norwalk PD sending patrol cars to an ICE location to stage out of without permission. Norwalk didn’t even say they’d have said no if they asked they said they did not ask so they told them to leave. And ICE did it again. And the police are supposed to respect an agency with zero respect for local law enforcement or even things like the 4th Amendment? They didn’t pick these men up because Norwalk police didn’t share info with them, thy picked them up because they were looking for Latinos to stop in public in violation of the 4th Amendment. Norwalk might not even have any record of these men never having dealt with them so what info is there to share? They have no records so they would not be in the system unless they made a complaint at some point. And how is your safety affected by having people there who’s only crime was crossing an imaginary line. AS IF the US were like one of those countries any of us would respect the northern border or any other country and just deal with it. Americans would say it’s their god-given right to go where they want like we have since 1620. This country in it’s entire history as never once respected sovereign borders. We go where we want, invade who we want, take what we want, and kick out everyone we do not like. We TOOK most of Mexico and now we’re mad some of them want to live here without asking, and someone should ask the Native Americans what they think of our borders.

      If the police had evidence someone violent was here that was in the system they would let ICE know. Even sanctuary cities do that. But just being here does not make you unsafe. Statistically you are something like 9 times more likely to be assaulted by an American.

  3. Skip Hagerty

    Why did ICE pick Ms. Chavez’s father as a person they wanted to detain? Why is that important detail never mentioned in any of these articles?

    1. adam smith

      You seem to be looking for a smoking gun like he’s another leader of MS-13 like we keep getting told about everyone picked up. He’s BROWN. That’s why they stopped him. They are stopping people for not being White all over the nation, but mostly in Blue states. He was not a person of interest. They saw someone Brown and took a shot.

  4. Priscilla Feral

    We are a nation of immigrants. No one is illegal although they may be undocumented and this thug-like brutality toward them – regardless of whether crimes have been committed is obscene, repulsive and shames our country. Working people keep the food industry, for example, alive. I oppose ICE and the violence behind such cruel, counterproductive seizures. The regime is using immigrants to become a police state as that’s what a dictator wants.

    1. Emily Kelting

      Absolutely.

    2. adam smith

      The irony here being food is literally rotting on the vines at farms all over the nation because workers are scared to show up. Prices are rising in part because of that, and Americans working at those farms are now also at risk because if the farms close they lose their jobs, too. Several states did this in the past. Georgia was one, I believe it was 2015. Hundreds of farms closed, thousands of Americans lost jobs, the state lost $200,000,000 in tax revenue that year, prices went way up locally, and republicans were happy to pay them to know that a brown person lost a job a White person would never do. And then they did what thy always do and blamed Obama. Construction projects right now are overbudget and behind, restaurants are short-staffed: this has the potential to ruin the economy if he is successful. Florida before Trump was elected tried to get the undocumented people back after they cracked down, and when they didn’t come back changed the child labor laws to let little kids work graveyard shift on school nights. Strange how none of the people crying about stolen jobs applied.

  5. niz judia

    i would like to believe any law enforcement, local, state or federal would act responsibility & within reason. still many do so without probable cause or properly attained warrants etc… it becomes the accused profound burden to PROVE OTHERWISE … if you do not like what you see, then support the individual or their families through the legal process. opposed to all that talking and commenting IJS so sick of all that chat

    1. David Muccigrosso

      Niz, that is not how our justice system works.

      The burden of proof is on the state in criminal matters. This is how it’s been for CENTURIES, stretching back to the English system that ours is based on.

    2. adam smith

      Someone told you the police can violate the 4th Amendment and the person accused has to prove it? Cool, then I support them violating your 4th Amendment right. You can sort it out later.

  6. John O’Neill

    The one person who seems to be getting a pass in all of this is Joe Biden. Sadly, ALL of this is a By-Product of his failed open border policy.
    While I don’t condone blanket actions against law abiding non-citizens, Biden and his ridiculous, chaotic open border policy created this.
    Lastly, President Obama claimed his #1 priority in 2008 campaign was immigration reform…..
    Guess what … He lied.

    1. Emily Kelting

      Joe Biden? After Trump in his first presidency separated parents from children and kept refugees in cages? And if you want to talk about lies, Trump’s assertions about the huge number of criminals coming into our country are all lies. In 2024, 1.6 million people were apprehended at the border, and only 1.1% of those had a prior criminal record. Trump was the one who lied and sowed fear about refugees being criminals when 99% aren’t. Furthermore, before the election, a bipartisan Border Act was in place, which would have rushed enforcement resources to the border, tightened asylum standards, expedited the removal of those who abuse the asylum system to enter the country unlawfully, and hired more Border Patrol officers. Senate Republicans blocked the Senate even from debating and considering amendments to the bipartisan Border Act. Senate Republicans bent to pressure from former President Trump to keep the border in chaos so he could wield it as an election issue. As Republican Sen. James Lankford, a coauthor of the Border Act, said, “President Trump said don’t fix anything during a presidential election.”
      When Congress could have have started to work on problems at the Southern Border through the Border Act, Trump shut down the fix in order to claim the immigration issue in his own way, which was to make it not a matter of immigration reform–which does need to happen, but a scare tactic about the number of criminals entering the country to embolden people like you, John. And you believed it. Because you probably believe all of Trumps lies that are fueled by Fox News.

    2. adam smith

      I love how you folks always blame Democrats and always give republicans a free pass despite Reagan making millions citizens, GW Bush having total control of government more than once and doing nothing, Trump 1.0 having total control the first two years an doing nothing, and even now doing a worse job than Biden with sending people back. They have ALL messed up the border. All of them. If you are claiming it’s only Democrats or mostly Democrats you are lying. Of all of them Reagan and Obama were the most successful. Reagan because he eliminated he problem of the ones here by making them citizens, something I support, and Obama was much better at control and return. To date no one has beaten his record. Trump 1.0 he let in twice as many and deported half as many for a total of net 4 times more than Obama (2×2). Trump 2.0 he has managed to slow hem coming in, but is way behind even Biden for returning people.

      As for immigration reform, Democrats agreed to everything Republicans wanted before Trump got elected. No pork, and we were ready to sign, and so were republicans when Trump told them to kill the bill so he could use it as a wedge issue and run on it. If republicans were really serious they would start by making it a FEDERAL felon for employers to hire them, holding employers personally responsible with criminal charges for them, not for the corporation. But they won’t because people like Trump have enjoyed the cheap labor for years and then they’d have to hire Americans who cost way more and still have some rights. They’d also make the process fair to come here and stop using the quota system to try to get more White people here. Newsflash: the rest of the First World has it better, they’re not coming. And isn’t it ironic how the right will talk about crimes committed by these people, but only the ones that came in under Democrats, or who got arrested during a Democrat’s term. However they can pin it on Democrats. Like 4 million came in on Trump 1.0 you think none of them broke any laws?

      But at the end of the day these people are the backbone of the economy, and White conservatives even now have not stepped up to reclaim those “stolen jobs”. Why not? Have YOU applied?

  7. Ashley Smith

    I didn’t ask if they were undocumented because it doesn’t matter.

    This isn’t about immigration status: it’s about due process and constitutional rights.

    It’s often said, by jurists from William Blackstone to Benjamin Franklin, that it is better to let many guilty people go free than to wrongly punish even one innocent person.

    That principle is at the heart of why our legal system is built on the presumption of innocence.

    Innocent until proven guilty isn’t just a phrase; it is one of the cornerstones of the Bill of Rights, woven into amendments that protect the accused.

    So the fundamental question here is not about immigration status. It is about how a government agency came into our community and treated people they were supposed to presume innocent. The question before us is whether due process and constitutional protections still hold.

    And as the Fourth Estate, that’s exactly my job: to shine a light when government power is used in ways that test or threaten those protections. It’s not about partisanship, it’s about accountability.

    How you interpret that is up to you.

    Some readers may feel reassured, believing this kind of enforcement is necessary to uphold the law.

    Others may feel disturbed, seeing the treatment of people presumed innocent as a dangerous erosion of rights.

    Still others may land somewhere in the middle: thinking it’s acceptable in rare circumstances, but troubling if it becomes routine. All of these reactions are part of the civic conversation.

    But at the core, the discussion isn’t about immigration; it’s about how far we are willing to bend the principle of presumed innocence, and whether we’re comfortable with the precedent that sets.

  8. Mike Murray

    Again, how can you determine if due process is taking place if you don’t know why he was detained. If he has outstanding warrants or criminal convictions. Is there a deportation order in effect? Failure to appear for immigration court? Legal status is a relevant question.

    1. Ashley Smith

      I’m not going to explain this again. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person — not just citizens — can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

      That means:

      People are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

      They are entitled to notice of the charges or reasons for detention.

      They must have a fair chance to challenge those charges in front of an impartial authority.

      They must be treated according to the rule of law, not just on the say-so of an agency.

      So when ICE (or any agency) detains someone, due process isn’t “do they have papers?” or “were they convicted?” The real question is: did the government follow the correct constitutional and legal steps before depriving them of liberty?

      That’s why I didn’t ask about immigration status or criminal history. Due process is about the government’s actions, not the person’s background. If you’re focused only on someone’s legal status, you’re not actually asking about due process — you’re looking for information that confirms your own bias.

    2. adam smith

      ICE refused to show any warrants and ICE is not in charge of people with warrants unless they are ICE warrants which they are required to show. The fact that they refused to show any warrants and have refused to comment should be proof this was profiling. Notice how he hasn’t been charged with any crimes, just detained. If they had a criminal warrant he’d have been charged,

  9. Liz Conti

    Folks, all of this is so un-necessary and the divisiveness it causes is completely attributable to the party that runs Norwalk and the State of CT. Their pacification of the voter and the political rhetoric does nothing to correct any miscarriage of justice if indeed this was, that is the part that no one seems to see or present any accountability for. You can talk all you want and share your feelings, but feelings and emotions of anger don’t solve problems. Only common sense and action solves problems, and none of that is seemingly present from any of our incompetent leaders.

    When local authorities of law enforcement refuse to work with federal authorities and make an issue out of a parking lot, no one is best served as to WHY they were there to seek information and further WHY they had to move forward with only the information they had in doing their job (ICE). Had Norwalk police chief Walsh and Mayor Riling put aside their politics and truly served the public interest and the interest of the 3 men apprehended, maybe things would have transpired differently. I am not sure people understand what really happened here and why. Politics and it’s divisive nature these days is an intolerable NOISE that reminds me of Macbeth’s fiery speech:

    Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,
    Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
    To the last syllable of recorded time;
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
    The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
    Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player,
    That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
    And then is heard no more. It is a tale
    Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
    Signifying nothing.

    CT Trust Act and lack of cooperation with ICE by local and state authorities is the noise of idiots full of sound and fury signifying nothing. It is unenforceable and is meant to pacify people. CT thinks that telling cops to not share info with ICE helps people when it does the opposite. IT doesn’t help public safety plus it contributes to the victimization of people who may indeed be here legally and are community residents and working law abiding folks, who are not criminals but rather may be randomly mis-identified and detained. Why are we contribution to miscarriages of justice to defend real criminals? Why are we not assisting ICE authorities and having a discussion as to why they are here and assisting them in proper identification of actual public safety threats?

    As far as the crime of being simply here illegally; that is something that needs to be addressed; our leaders are weak and incompetent and do not serve the interests they purport to defend in their actions; they talk out of both sides of their mouths with noise ie sound and fury and it signifies nothing with respect to real actionable change.

    If we want change, we need to recognize that the leaders who are there need to go and new leaders need to take the helm and return common sense to the agenda; not noise.

  10. Tysen Canevari

    Adam,

    After a couple of your responses couldnt read anymore. Ice is not picking up people for not being white. Why imply such silly rhetoric. Ask the chief, He will tell you that they were all wanted for a particular reason. You didnt mind them sneaking in but now you mind when they get thrown out? I am sure some have nice families but the law is the law. Tired of liberals choosing which to follow.

  11. Patrick McAuliffe

    Not everyone is persuaded by a real visceral reaction to masked armed federal agents disrupting and raiding public areas of our town. And given the fact that not everyone moves beyond the law and order level of morality to determine whether these ICE actions are morally and ethically just. I will make a play for individuals self interests. Many support these deportation moves because there is a belief that illegal immigrants are a drain on our economy. THis happens not to be true but more importantly, President Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” hands over more than $175 billion to ICE. That is larger than the annual military budget of every country in the world except for the U.S. and China. 70 % of those detained are working, paying taxes and living in the US for decades often. Our government is spending money like drunken sailors and we all and our children will pay the price now and in the future. Instead of cheering on these actions, pressure your representatives to force comprehensive immigration reform, creating a sensible sytem that is sustainable and ethical.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link